Book Summaries
How an Ancient Greek Measured the Size of Earth
An Ancient Greek named Eratosthenes (276-194 B.C) did something that was considered, at the time, impossible. He made the first recorded measurement of the circumference of the Earth.
An Ancient Greek named Eratosthenes (276-194 B.C) did something that was considered, at the time, impossible. He made the first recorded measurement of the circumference of the Earth.
Of course, Erasthenes had no expensive survey equipment, and most likely, he didn’t have lasers or satellites (or Google Earth). And he didn’t even put his own life at stake by going on a ship journey that would take the rest of his life to complete to circumnavigate the Earth.
He just did some out-of-the-box thinking, while in the Library of Alexandria. He read that there was a deep well in Syene (a city in southern Egypt) that would have its bottom completely lit by the noon sun one day a year. This implied that the sun must be directly overhead at that moment. He also observed that at the same time, vertical objects in Alexandria (directly north of Syene) cast a shadow. This meant that Alexandria received sunlight at a slightly different angle at the same time.
Eratosthenes realized that he could use this information to estimate the curvature of the earth.
He observed that the shadows at noon at that time of year (in Alexandria) made an angle that was one-fiftieth of an arc of a circle (or 7.2 degrees). By using geometry, he could prove that the circumference of Earth must be 50 times the distance between Alexandria and Syene.
The interesting thing is that while modern attempts to replicate these calculation differ in terms of the precise size of the angles, conversion rates between ancient and modern units of measurement, and the precise distance between the ancient cities, typical estimates put his calculation within only 3 percent of the actual value.
Eratosthenes’ calculation was a great improvement on previous knowledge, and his error was negligible. Even modern scientists were more off only a few decades ago about the size and age of the universe.
1,700 years after the Greek’s calculation, the famous Christopher Columbus made a mistake in his calculations, which was 25 percent short of the actual circumference of the earth. That was one of the main reasons Columbus thought he was in India, and not North America. Had Columbus known about Eratosthenes’ calculation, he would have avoided that mistake.
In business, people often assume that they need very sophisticated tools and large data sets to be able to assess risk, but a simple observation, like that of Eratosthenes can save you a lot of hassle. The “hard” way isn’t always the best way.
Source*: How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business, Douglass W. Hubbard*
YARPP List
Related posts:
- Will It Fly Summary (7/10)
- Modern Man in Search of a Soul Summary (8/10)
- Part 2: Stir Up The Transgressive and Taboo (The Art of Seduction)
- Chapter 19: And They Lived Happily Every After (Sapiens)
Keep Reading
Related Articles
Book Summaries
Irrational Exuberance Summary (Ch. 4,5,6)
The below sections will summarize chapters 4, 5, and 6 from [Irrational Exuberance.](https://amzn.to/3E5ODTY) The emergence and evolution of speculative bubbles in financial markets is intricately tied to the history and role of the news media.
Book Summaries
How to Read X
1. Jacques Ellul:A French philosopher, sociologist, and legal scholar known for his critique of technology’s dominance over human life. His best-known work, “The Technological Society,” is a thorough examination of technology’s role in Western societies. 2. G.K.
Book Summaries
Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology Summary (8/10)
In [Technopoly](https://amzn.to/3JXmI9F), Postman argues that technology has become increasingly dominant in American culture. He contends that technology has not only changed what we do but how we think about ourselves and our world.
Book Summaries
The Error in Political Correctness (Week 29 of Wisdom)
What is wrong with political correctness? Answer: Hegel said it best. > The Hegelian dialectic comprises three dialectical stages of development: athesis, giving rise to its reaction; anantithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis; and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a